C transitive: If A ? Prospect Theory Versus Expected Utility Theory: Assumptions, Predictions, Intuition and Modelling of Risk Attitudes Michał Lewandowski∗ Submitted: 3.04.2017,Accepted: 4.12.2017 Abstract The main focus of this tutorial/review is on presenting Prospect Theory in the context of the still ongoing debate between the behavioral (mainly 6.1.1 Preferences Over Lotteries We begin by building up a theory of rational preferences over lotteries. B and B ? However, according to expected utility theory, the probabilistic insurance is better than the regular insurance. In their work they take into … Expected Utility Expected Utility Theory is the workhorse model of choice under risk Unfortunately, it is another model which has something unobservable The utility of every possible outcome of a lottery So we have to –gure out how to test it We have already gone through this process for the model of ™standard™(i.e. Expected Utility Theory This is an alternative to “the classical expected utility model, decision makers are assumed to be stonemen”. Studies that investigate the empirical validity of expected utility theory predominantly use a random choice setting. De nition:Full insurance is d = 1. London, Edward Elgar, 1997, p. 342-350). Their tests of expected utility theory focus on the independence axiom. EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY Prepared for the Handbook of Economic Methodology (J.Davis, W.Hands, and U.Maki, eds. The higher a consumer’s total utility, the greater that consumer’s level of satisfaction. Remarkably, they viewed the development of the expected utility model His expected utility from buying d dollars of insurance is EU(d) = (1 p)u(w qd) + pu w qd (1 d): Under what conditions will he insure, and for how much of the loss? In other words, if one would like to pay yto insure a probability pof losing x, then one should de nitely be willing to pay a lower price ryto reduce the probability of losing xfrom pto (1 r)p, 0 0, respectively. If we could measure utility, total utility would be the number of units of utility that a consumer gains from consuming a given quantity of a good, service, or activity during a particular time period. U(A) > U(B) iff A is preferred to (chosen over) B – Contradicted by preference reversals • Preferences are well ordered – i.e. Lecture Notes 1 Microeconomic Theory Guoqiang TIAN Department of Economics Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 (gtian@tamu.edu) August, 2002/Revised: January 2018 Nolan Miller Notes on Microeconomic Theory: Chapter 6 ver: Aug. 2006 If Land L0 are lotteries, a compound lottery over these two lotteries can be represented as aL+(1−a)L0,where0 ≤a≤1 is the probability of lottery Loccurring. C, then A ? Expected Utility Theory – Crucial Features • Utility (“degree of liking”) is defined by (revealed) preferences – i.e. per unit. Slightly longer version than the published one. For example, the studies described in Kahneman and Tversky 3 (1979) report frequency distributions of the choices among lotteries by groups of individu-als. Total Utility.