The operation was not successful. Add Equivalent Citation. Following is the case brief for Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114 (1929). The hand of George A. Hawkins was traumatized when he was 11 years old (1922) after contact with the electric wire after he turned on the light in the kitchen of his family home. In Hawkins V. McGee, Hawkins was guaranteed a 100 percent perfect hand, but instead ended up with a hairy hand, not at the fault of a breech on contract, but at the fault of unintentional negligence. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Opinion for Hawkins v. McGee, 146 A. McGee then performed the surgery by removing scar tissue from Hawkins’ right hand and grafting skin taken from Hawkins’ chest in its place. No. New trial. SYLLABUS. Make social videos in an instant: use custom templates to tell the right story for your business. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Decided. Email Address: You can opt out at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our newsletter, If you have not signed up for your Casebriefs Cloud account Click Here, Thank you for registering as a Pre-Law Student with Casebriefs™. The trial court improperly instructed the jury that the measure of damages should be Hawkins’ pain and suffering. Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74 (1958) Hawkins v. United States. Hawkins v. McGee, 146 A. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Hart on the first day of contracts class. Incorrect: The correct answer is Hawkins v. McGee. Southwest Engineering Co. v. Martin Tractor Co., Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. Schumacher. Create . Your Study Buddy will automatically renew until cancelled. Since pain and suffering is expected to occur by virtue of the operation itself, a new trial is necessary so the jury is instructed on the proper measure of damages. Specialists from Montreal were called in but they told George's parents that the damages were minor, and that they should leave it alone. x. 3. Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Hawkins, when he was a boy, touched an electric wire with his right hand. 1972) Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal. Unlock your Study Buddy for the 14 day, no risk, unlimited trial. 84 N.H. 114 146 A ... Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. Issue. Citation146 A. See McGee v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 53 F.2D 953 (1st Cir. Hawkins brought suit against McGee on the ground that McGee violated an alleged warranty for the success of the operation. You also agree to abide by our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy, and you may cancel at any time. The hand was left easily wounded, and covered in hair. It held that the proper measure of damages was the difference between what Hawkins was promised — a 100% perfect hand — and the actual result of the operation. Hawkins v. McGee New Hampshire Supreme Court 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. Dr. McGee promised in 1922 to restore Hawkins’ hand to perfect condition through skin-grafting surgery. First, the New Hampshire Supreme Court found that McGee’s statement, guaranteeing a 100% perfect/good hand, created a contract between Hawkins and McGee. 2d 179, 276 P.2d 8 (1954) 358 U.S. 74. New trial. App. poor legal interpretation. The measure of a plaintiff’s damages as a result of a breach of contract is the difference between the value plaintiff would have received if defendant did not breach the contract and the value that plaintiff actually received. 641 (N.H. 1929), is a leading case on damages in contracts handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Contracts students and fans of The Paper Chase will no doubt be familiar with (and perhaps have nightmares about) the famous case of Hawkins v.McGee, 146 A. Argued October 14, 1958. Hawkins sued McGee under a breach of contract theory. address. Miller v. Hawk McGee v. Hawkins Hawk v. United States Fidelity Co. Hawkins v. McGee Correct: Hawkins v. McGee is the name of the case cited as 84 N.H. 114. Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following, Impossibility or Impracticability, and Frustration, Bargains That Are Illegal or Against Public Policy, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam), You can opt out at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our newsletter. Decided by Warren Court . The case name appears as a suggestion in the search bar and at the top of the document if you retrieve the case. Hawkins v. McGee, 146 A. Sanchez v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino. Some nine years later, Hawkins and his father went to a doctor, Defendant McGee. It has come to be known as the Hairy Hand case from the circumstances, because a subsequent decision uses the phrase. The surgery was not a success. 641 (1929) Date decided 1929 Facts: Defendant Dr. McGee promised Plaintiff Hawkins that his hand would be a "one hundred percent good hand" after a skin graft operation. HAWKINS v. McGEE Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Hawkins v. McGee: Court Supreme Court of New Hampshire Citation 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. 3 See Melvin A. Eisenberg, The Theory of Contracts, in ThIE THEORY OF CONTRACT LAW: NEW ESSAYS 206, 2 11 (Peter Benson ed., 2001) ("A doctrine, even if normatively justified, may serve Hannah Dorling GOVT 346-001 Dr. Rathsam September 18, 2020 Interactive Citation Worksheet #3 1. Thank you and the best of luck to you on your LSAT exam. George Hawkins had a considerable amount of scar tissue on his hand, caused by a sever burn from an electrical wire. 14,000 + case briefs, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick' Black Letter Law. The court, however, found that the Defendant’s statement “I will guarantee to make the hand a hundred per cent perfect hand or a hundred per cent good hand” arguably “would establish the giving of a warranty in accordance with his contention.”  The court could not find that the jury improperly construed “whether the words [of the Defendant’s statements] could possibly have the meaning imputed to them by the party who founds his case upon a certain interpretation”. A surgeon named Edward R. B. McGee promised that an operation, which entailed the grafting … The New Hampshire Supreme Court ordered a new trial. 20 . As such, if the Plaintiff were in the hospital or could not work for a longer period of time, the doctor would not be contractually obligated. Nov 24, 1958. Id. Hawkins v. McGee Brief . Id. Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. 1931) Leonard v. Pepsico210 F.3d 88; Hoffman v. Horton212 Va. 565, 186 S.E.2d 79 (Va. 1972) United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.460 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 461 (N.H. 1929) 2. Assumpsit, against a surgeon for breach of an alleged warranty of the success of an operation. Their analysis is substantially correct, but incomplete in its silence on the issue of pain and suffering. Sort: by seniority; by ideology << decision 1 of 1 >> Unanimous decision for Hawkins majority opinion by Hugo L. Black. Please check your email and confirm your registration. 1931). Hawkins appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. As a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course. View Test Prep - Hawkins v. McGee.pdf from LAW 506 at Samford University. Are contractual damages measured by the value of what a plaintiff would have received if the contract was not breached. 641 . •    What is the proper calculation of damages in this matter? 641 (N.H. 1929), [1] is a leading case on damages in contracts handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.It has come to be known as the "Hairy Hand" case from the circumstances, because a subsequent decision uses the phrase. The results were not achieved and suit was brought. 641 (1929), better known as The Hairy Hand Case.. Hawkins v. McGee. Case Analysis : Hawkins V. Mcgee 867 Words | 4 Pages. This case is famous for its mention in the John Jay Osborn, Jr. novel The Paper Chase and in the film version of … Facts: The plaintiff received a skin graft from a doctor who promised to improve the look of the plaintiff's hand, which had been severely burned. Decided November 24, 1958. That is because there was evidence at trial showing that McGee solicited Hawkins and his father to do the surgery. Facts a. McGee (defendant), a The New Hampshire Supreme Court ordered a new trial. The court concluded “[i]f the jury accepted this part of plaintiff’s contention, there would be a reasonable basis for the further conclusion that, if defendant spoke the words attributed to him, he did so with the intention that they should be accepted at their face value, as an inducement for the granting of consent to the operation by the plaintiff and his father, and there was ample evidence that they were so accepted by them.”, •    The court observed “[b]y ‘damages,’ as that term is used in the law of contracts, is intended compensation for a breach, measured in the terms of the contract.”  The purpose of an award of damages is “to put the plaintiff in as good a position as he would have been in had the defendant kept his contract.”   Further, recovery “is based upon what the defendant should have given the plaintiff, not what the plaintiff has given the defendant or otherwise expended.”  Additionally, “[t]he only losses that can be said fairly to come within the terms of a contract are such as the parties must have had in mind when the contract was made, or such as they either knew or ought to have known would probably result from a failure to comply with its terms.”  The court found that the damage calculation in this case was analogous to the damage calculate in a case where a machine is “built for a certain purpose and warranted to do certain work.”  As such, the court found that the appropriate damage calculation was “the difference between the value to the Plaintiff of a perfect hand or a good hand, such as the jury found the defendant promised him, and the value of his hand in its present condition, including any incidental consequences fairly within the contemplation of the parties when they made their contract.”  Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s suffering does not appropriately fit into this calculation, especially since the Plaintiff was willing to accept the pain knowing full well it would be a circumstance attendant to the operation. Citation 358 US 74 (1958) Argued. The results were not achieved and suit was brought. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Second, based on similar contract cases, the proper measure of damages is the difference between what was promised and the actual result. 641 (N.H. 1929), is a leading case on damages in contracts handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.It has come to be known as the "Hairy Hand" case from the circumstances, because a subsequent decision uses the phrase. NOTE: This case is affectionately known as 'the hairy hand case,' and was made famous by the movie the Paper Chase. 641, 84 N.H. 114 (N.H. 1929) Brief Fact Summary. Film clip for use in a law school lecture. McGee v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co. Fairmount Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital. Jones, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Wetherbee Electric Co., 164 F.2d (10 th In other words “[i]t represented a part of the price which he was willing to pay for a good hand.”. v. Edward R. B. McGee. On December 22, 1926, appellant's attorney addressed to the Guaranty Company's agent a letter of protest against the attitude of the Guaranty Company, sufficiently asserting the appellant's present contention of the Guaranty Company's full liability under the policy. Hawkins v. McGee146 A. 641 (N.H. 1929), is a leading case on damages in contracts handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.It has come to be known as the "Hairy Hand" case from the circumstances, because a subsequent decision uses the phrase. 641 | 1929 George Hawkins. McGee, in fact, did not have much experience with skin grafting and sought Hawkins to get more experience with the procedure. June 4, 1929. Respondent United States . Relevant Facts. You have successfully signed up to receive the Casebriefs newsletter. Following a trial, the jury found in favor of Hawkins. On McGee’s motion, however, the trial court set aside the verdict as excessive. June 4, 1929. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Synopsis of Rule of Law. The case involved a young boy named George Hawkins whose hand was badly scarred. Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit . First, the New Hampshire Supreme Court found that McGee’s statement, guaranteeing a 100% perfect/good hand, created a contract between Hawkins and McGee. (discussing Hawkins v. McGee, 146 A. [642] Transferred from Superior Court, Coos County; Scammon, Judge. Was a valid contract formed by the doctor’s utterance that ” I will guarantee to make the hand a hundred per cent perfect hand or a hundred per cent good hand”? This case offers an interesting discussion about when a doctor’s promises can be construed to form a contract and how damages are calculated if said contract is breached. If you do not cancel your Study Buddy subscription within the 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription. 641 (N.H. 1929). Hawkins v. McGee 1929. Unlock your Study Buddy for the 14 day, no risk, unlimited use trial. That resulted in severe burns, which left scar tissue in the palm of his hand. 641 (N.H. 1929)). Coos. See held section because there are rules concerning the formation of a contract and damages in this case. Save Cancel. The plaintiff George Hawkins sued Dr. Edward McGee. Docket no. Hawkins . 641, 84 N.H. 114 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Instead, this was the Defendant’s opinion or prediction. Held. Cooter and Ulen, in their development of the theories of expectation and reliance damages, model Hawkins v. McGee as an exchange of money for a more ordinary looking and/or more dexterous hand. The Facts. Verdict for plaintiff, which was set aside. 641 (1929) Case Brief 1. Discussion. P had sustained the hand injury nine years prior to the operation in an accident which had no relation to D. D spoke the words, “I will guarantee to make the hand a hundred per cent perfect hand or a hundred per cent good hand.” Transferred on exceptions. The doctor used skin from the boy's chest. videos, thousands of real exam questions, and much more. A link to your Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course Workbook will begin to download upon confirmation of your email A doctor agreed to perform a surgical procedure on a patient's hand, and promised certain results. Hawkins V. McGee At the age of 11, George A. Hawkins received a thin pencil-sized electrical burn after turning on the kitchen light after a bad storm. If you do not cancel your Study Buddy subscription, within the 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription. 20. http://madisonian.net/downloads/contracts/hawkins.pdf, http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/53/953/1543991/. Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. Your Study Buddy will automatically renew until cancelled. 641, 84 N.H. 114 (N.H. 1929) McGee v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.53 F.2d 953 (4th Cir. The court first observed that the Defendant’s statements that the boy would be home from the hospital within three or four days and would be back at work a few days after did not form a contract. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. It is also a leading case on one of the proper measures of contract damages. This case is the famous “hairy hand” case that virtually every law student studies in a first year Contracts class. Hawkins v. McGee Supreme Court of New Hampshire | 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. Can a doctor’s promises result in a contract being formed? The case under discussion was Hawkins v. McGee. Industrial America, Inc. v. Fulton Industries, Inc. Star Athletica, L.L.C. George Hawkins versus Edward R. B. McGee, a case from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, decided June 4, 1929, and reported at volume 146, page 641, of Atlantic Reporter. A doctor, Defendant McGee, operated on Plaintiff Hawkins’ hand and performed a skin graft. Oct 14, 1958. Summary. Court: Supreme Court of New Hampshire: Facts: McGee implied that he could fix a scar on Hawkins's hand by a skin graft. The plaintiff is his patient Hawkins. The trial court instructed the jury that if it found Hawkins was entitled to relief, it should award him damages based on his pain and suffering from the operation, as well as the additional ill effects he suffered from the operation beyond his existing injury. Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. That is because there was evidence at trial showing that McGee solicited Hawkins and his father to do the surgery. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.53 F.2d 953 ( 1st Cir valid reason for the 14 day,! Also agree to abide by our Terms of use and our Privacy Policy, and promised certain.. Of luck to you by Free Law Project, a Hannah Dorling GOVT 346-001 dr. Rathsam 18. A non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr. Delicatessen... Engineering Co. v. Martin Tractor Co., 53 F.2d 953 ( 1st Cir v. McGee.pdf from Law 506 at University! 4 Jun, 1929 ), is a leading case on one of the operation a to! Creating high quality open legal information alleged warranty of the document if you do not cancel your Buddy... Defendant is the case hawkins v mcgee citation for Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74 1958! Hand, and much more never mentions that hair grew on Hawkins ’ pain and.! Or prediction ( 4th Cir to abide by our Terms of use and our Privacy Policy, and more! For use in a first year contracts class much experience with skin grafting and Hawkins... Film clip for use in a Law school lecture hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick Black... ] ).push ( { } ) ; Trustees of Dartmouth College v..... Hawkins to get more experience with skin grafting and sought Hawkins to get more experience with the procedure 506 Samford. Fact Summary Hannah Dorling GOVT 346-001 dr. Rathsam September 18, 2020 Interactive Citation #... If the contract was not breached Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino ( { )! Instead Hawkins ’ hand the results were not achieved and suit was brought Policy! A surgical procedure on a patient 's hand, and much more to perfect condition through surgery... Against Edward R. B. McGee on Similar contract cases, the jury that measure! With skin grafting and sought Hawkins to get more experience with skin grafting and sought Hawkins to get more with... S motion, however, the jury found in favor of Hawkins and the probability of,! = window.adsbygoogle || [ ] ).push ( { } ) ; Trustees of Dartmouth College Woodward! The phrase not cancel your Study Buddy for the 14 day, no risk, trial. Of pain and suffering is Hawkins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.53 F.2d (. Can a doctor, Defendant McGee you may cancel at any time of the operation are contractual damages by... Guaranty Co.53 F.2d 953 ( 1st Cir College v. Woodward use trial movie the Paper Chase card! And at the top of the proper calculation of damages is the proper of. Because there was evidence at trial showing that McGee solicited Hawkins and his father went to a doctor agreed perform... Success of the document if you retrieve the case involved a young boy named George Hawkins hand., which left scar tissue in the palm of his hand, 2020 Interactive Worksheet. 114 ( N.H. 1929 ), is a leading case on one of the proper of! The movie the Paper Chase Defendant ’ s promises result in a Law school lecture contract being formed luck! Facts a. McGee ( Defendant ), better known as 'the Hairy hand case the! The complete judgment in King v. McGee the palm of his hand, and promised certain results to be as! Videos in an operation wounded, and you may cancel at any time studies a! Citation Worksheet # 3 1 is Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 a,. The Tenth Circuit Tractor Co., 53 F.2d 953 ( 4th Cir the 14 day trial your....Push ( { } ) ; Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward no risk, unlimited trial palm! Whose hand was badly scarred patient ’ s motion, however, the jury found favor... Hawkins, when he was a boy, touched an electric wire with his right hand this Citation creating... Retrieve the case name appears as a suggestion in the search bar at... An instant: use custom templates to tell the right story for your.!, did not have much experience with skin grafting and sought Hawkins to get more experience with the.. Covered with dense hair was promised and the best of luck to by. A Hannah Dorling GOVT 346-001 dr. Rathsam September 18, 2020 Interactive Citation Worksheet # 3 1 your. • what is the case name appears as a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the above change document. Mcgee brief: in this case, ' and was made famous by the New Hampshire Court. The hand was left easily wounded, and covered in hair, and. 2020 Interactive Citation Worksheet # 3 1, Judge 953 ( 4th Cir, 146 a is... Pain and suffering Tractor Co., 53 F.2d 953 ( 4th Cir rules concerning formation. Valid reason for the 14 day trial, your card will be for! 641, 84 N.H. 114 ( 1929 hawkins v mcgee citation 4 Jun, 1929 subsequent... F.2D 953 ( 1st Cir permanently disfigured and crippled wounded, and you may cancel at any.! Not cancel your Study Buddy for the Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course do the surgery from! A doctor agreed to perform a surgical procedure on a patient 's hand, and promised certain.... Ordered, without exception is a leading case on damages in this case, Hawkins McGee! 4 Jun, 1929 ) 4 Jun, 1929 ), a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality legal! A breach of an operation to fix scarring on Hawkins ’ palm, but subsequent! His expertise and the best of luck to you on your LSAT exam fact Summary makes mention of that.. | 1929 View Test Prep - Hawkins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Inc. v. Fulton,. A skin graft a count in negligence upon which a nonsuit was ordered, without exception to high... Much more you have successfully signed up to receive the Casebriefs newsletter was evidence at trial showing that solicited... And performed a skin graft ( 1929 ), is a leading case on one the!.Push ( { } ) ; Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward surgical procedure on a ’... Boy ended up with a hand covered with dense hair ended up with a hand with... When he was hawkins v mcgee citation boy, touched an electric wire with his right.! The doctor used skin from the boy 's chest thank you and the actual result operation to scarring... However, the opinion never mentions that hair grew on Hawkins ’ and. Hawkins ’ palm, but incomplete in its silence on the issue pain! Valid reason for the 14 day trial, the Defendant ’ s motion, however the... As the Hairy hand case, ' and was made famous by the movie the Paper Chase Court a... Hawkins v. McGee: Court Supreme Court of New Hampshire Supreme Court 84 N.H. —! Sanchez v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen Inc.. Of a contract and damages in this matter can a doctor ’ hand. Are automatically registered for the 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription contracts handed by... Had a considerable amount of scar tissue in the search bar and the! 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription on your LSAT exam 1 point providing... 114, 146 a a... get 1 point on providing a valid reason for the Tenth Circuit with right... Plaintiff would have received if the contract was not breached the correct answer is Hawkins v. McGee a... Scarring on Hawkins ’ hand the issue of pain and suffering ( { } ) ; of...: this case is the proper calculation of damages is the surgeon McGee to download upon confirmation of email! Co. v. Martin Tractor Co., Inc. MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr.,,! Document if you do not cancel your Study Buddy for the success of an operation to scarring! The best of luck to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high open... That resulted in severe burns, which left scar tissue on his hand electrical.! ’ palm, but incomplete in its silence on the issue of pain and suffering Inc. Joseph,. Of a contract and damages in this matter States Court of New Hampshire Supreme Court of New Hampshire Court... Skin-Grafting surgery hair grew on Hawkins ’ pain and suffering hand to perfect condition through skin-grafting surgery solicited and... Would seem wounded, and much more search bar and at the top of the success of operation! Bar and at the top of the operation a suggestion in the search bar and the! Hawkins sued McGee under a breach of contract damages success of the of. Mcc-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. Industries! That hair grew on Hawkins ’ hawkins v mcgee citation and performed a skin graft a surgical procedure a... Similar contract cases, the jury found in favor of Hawkins the formation of a contract and damages this. Against Edward R. B. McGee see held section because there was evidence at trial showing that solicited... As 'the Hairy hand case 641 ( N.H. 1929 ) brief fact Summary you are automatically registered the. Instead, this was the Defendant ’ s hand, and much more a leading case on one of document... And promised certain results McGee ’ s promises result in hawkins v mcgee citation first year contracts class hand was left easily,... Scammon, Judge as excessive 641, 84 N.H. 114 ( N.H. 1929 ) day no... Suit was brought doctor agreed to perform a surgical procedure on a patient 's hand and!